About Us Funding Opportunities Program Areas News & Information Resources & Publications Contact Us Site Map

Home


Integrated Health Care


In 2005, the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health completed a strategic planning process through which it was decided to focus our grantmaking in priority areas for the next several years. One priority area is Integrated Health Care.

Funds in the Integrated Health Care Initiative grant program were distributed through a Request for Proposals (RFP) process in April 2006. Through the RFP, the Foundation awarded more than $2.6 million over three years to Texas primary care and pediatric clinics to promote effective identification and treatment of mental health problems in primary care settings.

The five grantee organizations were funded to adopt the collaborative care model, an integrated health care approach in which primary care and mental health providers partner to manage the treatment of mental health problems in the primary care or pediatric setting, and to address barriers to implementation that they encounter. Two decades of research have demonstrated that the collaborative care model improves primary care patients' mental health outcomes with a minimal investment of resources.

With the help of national integrated health care experts and a distinguished evaluation team, the Foundation is working with the Integrated Health Care grantees over the three-year funding period to determine how best to implement collaborative care in "real world" settings. Lessons learned from the initiative will be used to promote integrated health care across Texas.

This page provides an overview of integrated health care and the collaborative care model. Please use the links on the right side of the page to access more information about the Integrated Health Care Initiative grant program, as well as valuable clinical and research resources.

   • Why is the Foundation focusing on integrated health care?
   • What is integrated health care?
   • What is collaborative care?
   • How can the collaborative care model be adapted to fit an organization's unique needs?
   • How do patients move through a collaborative care system from detection to recovery?
   • What is the evidence for collaborative care?
   • What are the barriers to integrated health care?
   • What are the Foundation's goals for the Integrated Health Care Initiative?

Why is the Foundation focusing on integrated health care?
State and National Activities
Integrated health care is a timely focus for the Foundation’s investment given activities at both the state and national level. At the state level, the 2003 reorganization of Texas’ health and human service agencies in the 78th legislative session reflected the state’s awareness of the need for integrating mental and physical health. In the reorganization, the state mental health agency was brought under the larger umbrella of health in Texas for the first time. Dr. David Lakey, Commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services, has expressed his commitment to integrated health care, as have many state health and mental health leaders.

At the national level, the need to integrate physical and mental health care was prominently highlighted in the final report of the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. One of its subcommittees focused exclusively on the interface of general medicine and mental health. The reason for this emphasis was summarized in the subcommittee’s report to the President:

"A fundamental premise of this report is that mental and medical conditions are highly interconnected. Therefore, improving care for individuals with mental disorders requires close attention to the interface of mental health and general medical care."

The integrated health care subcommittee concluded that there are well-tested, effective models for providing integrated care. However, substantial barriers exist to their implementation. The groundwork has been laid, and the time is ripe for addressing those real-world barriers.

The Foundation’s Core Values
Integrated health care comprises the core values to which the Foundation has been committed since its inception in the 1940s, including:

Mental health services for the underserved, including rural populations
Culturally competent mental health service delivery
The elimination of the stigma of mental illness

Most people seek help for mental health problems in primary care settings, such as community health clinics. Some do so because they are uninsured or their insurance does not provide adequate coverage of mental health services. For people in rural settings, the closest specialty mental health clinic can be miles away. Cultural beliefs and attitudes toward mental illness leads some people, especially those in ethnic minority groups, to seek help in medical settings. With the recent changes in the state’s eligibility criteria for public mental health services, people whose psychiatric diagnoses are no longer covered must now seek care in other settings, including primary care clinics.

Providing appropriate mental health treatment in the primary care setting presents an important opportunity to reach groups who cannot or will not access care in the specialty mental health setting. Treating mental health problems in the primary care setting is also crucial because many who seek help there have milder symptoms that, if treated appropriately, can be prevented from developing into a more disabling disorder.

Unfortunately, mental health problems often go undetected and untreated in the primary care setting. Primary care physicians tend to miss mental disorders in their patients about half the time. When physicians do detect mental disorders in their patients, they often fail to provide them with adequate treatment. Screening alone does not improve outcomes for primary care patients with mental health problems, nor does physician training. Patient outcomes do improve, however, when screening and physician training are done in the context of an integrated health care model, in which primary care patients are provided effective treatment.

Now is the time to advance the integration of mental health and physical health care. Solid research has demonstrated the effectiveness of integration models. Federal and state leaders are encouraging integration. Effective integration of mental and physical health treatment will enable Texas to provide appropriate care to its most ethnically diverse and geographically dispersed citizens and to address mental health problems
before they worsen, saving money that would go to more extensive and expensive care.

BACK TO TOP

What is integrated health care?
Integrated health care can be defined in many ways. For the purposes of the Foundation’s initiative, it means systematically combining physical and mental health services. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways, and integrated health care approaches vary in the extent to which they are truly integrated.

The most common models of integrated health care focus on either referrals or collocation of services. With the referral approach, physical health care providers develop agreements with mental health providers, to whom they refer their patients with mental health needs. The physical health care providers typically do not follow up on the referral once it has been made.

In a collocation model, physical health care providers and mental health providers are physically located in the same building or on the same premises, with the idea that the proximity of these services will make it easier for people to access care for their physical and mental health problems.

While both referrals and collocated services are important elements of an integrated health care model, neither referrals alone or collocation alone produces lasting, positive patient outcomes.

Over 20 years of solid research supports collaborative care as the most effective model of integrated health care.

BACK TO TOP

What is collaborative care?
Collaborative care is an integrated health care model in which physical health and mental health providers partner to manage the treatment of mild to moderate psychiatric disorders and stable severe psychiatric disordersin the primary care setting.

Collaborative care can be effectively implemented in a number of ways. It may include brief psychotherapy, or simply medication management and patient education. There are 4 essential elements that must be present in some form:

Mental health assessment tool
Clinical care manager
Patient registry
Psychiatric consultation.

A mental health assessment tool is used to evaluate the presence of psychiatric disorders in primary care patients who screen positive for, or are suspected of having, a psychiatric disorder. It is also used to track the recovery of those with identified mental health needs.

A clinical care manager is a professional or paraprofessional who is responsible for following patients with identified mental health needs in the primary care setting and monitoring their response to treatment. Clinical care managers are the linchpin of the collaborative care model. The clinical care manager has regular contact with the patient to track his or her treatment adherence and response. The clinical care manager also provides the patient with education about the psychiatric disorder and its treatment to empower the patient and to address stigmatizing beliefs. This educational role is expanded when the patient is a child to include outreach to the family, family and parent education, and family empowerment (e.g., educating parents about what questions to ask of a pediatrician or psychotherapist).

The clinical care manager’s role is qualitatively different from that of a case manager or care coordinator. Clinical care managers focus on the patients’ mental health needs and treatment, not on their social service needs and linkages. They are responsible for actively monitoring the patients’ treatment adherence and response, not just managing patients’ appointments.

The typical active caseload for a full-time clinical care manager providing basic care management is 90 to 120 patients (or three to five new patients per week). A full-time clinical care manager can typically provide support to six or seven full-time primary care physicians.

The clinical care manager uses a patient registry to track the patients with identified mental health needs. The patient registry contains patients’ scores on the mental health assessment tool, as well as a record of each contact that the primary care physician and care manager has or attempts to have with the patient.

A psychiatrist provides supervision of the clinical care manager. Together, they review the patient registry, focusing on those in the care manager’s caseload who are not responding or adhering to treatment. When needed, the psychiatrist makes recommendation for treatment adjustments (e.g., medication change), which the care manager communicates to the primary care physician.

BACK TO TOP

How can the collaborative care model be adapted to fit an organization’s unique needs?
There is a great deal of flexibility in the collaborative care model, even in the implementation of its required elements. Organizations can create and implement a collaborative care system that reflects their organizational resources and their patients’ needs.

Diagnostic groups
The bulk of research on collaborative care models has focused on the treatment of depression. However, emerging research has found the collaborative care approach to be useful with other diagnoses, and collaborative care experts agree that it can be useful in treating many types of mild to moderate psychiatric disorders or stable severe psychiatric disorders in the primary care setting.

Patient identification
Patients with mental health needs can be identified in different ways. Some providers choose to use a standardized screening instrument to systematically screen primary care patients for mental health problems. Other providers rely on informal means to identify patients with suspected mental health needs. Both approaches have their costs and benefits. Screening protocols improve the detection of mental health problems, but can be costly and time-consuming. Informal detection imposes less of a burden on primary care staff, but can lead to low rates of detection of mental health problems. The best approach depends on the resources of the organization.

Assessment tools

Any instrument that covers the psychiatric diagnoses to be treated in the primary care setting is appropriate, as long as it has adequate psychometric properties (i.e., adequate reliability and validity with the target population). Patients complete the assessment tool regularly, so the clinical care manager can monitor their response to treatment.

The assessment tool is different from a screening instrument. A positive result on a screening instrument signals the physician that the patient is likely experiencing difficulties. An assessment tool is then used to establish that the patient is indeed experiencing difficulties and the nature of the problem. The physician supplements the assessment tool results with additional questions to confirm the diagnosis.

Interventions
Psychotropic medication is the most common intervention used to treatment mental health problems in the primary care setting. The primary care physician or other qualified staff (e.g., nurse practitioner) prescribes an antidepressant or other appropriate medication, and the care manager monitors the patient’s response and adherence to the medication.

When pharmacotherapy is the intervention employed, the organization may require its providers to use a medication algorithm to guide the choice and dosage of medications. There are multiple algorithms available for organizations interested in adopting one.


Collaborative care models can also include brief evidence-based psychotherapy as an intervention. There are several brief evidence-based psychotherapies that have been used in the primary care setting, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, and problem solving therapy. Behavior management and related evidence-based treatments are also options for treating children. These therapies can be conducted by clinical care managers with the appropriate credentials or by a collocated mental health professional.

Psychotherapy and behavior management approaches are particularly important options for children. Depending on the diagnosis, pharmacotherapy may not be the first-line remedy for children, given concerns about the safety and effectiveness of using psychotropic medications with children.

Clinical care manager
A variety of professionals and paraprofessionals can be trained to be effective caremanagers. Many of the research studies on collaborative carehave used licensed professionals in that role, including nurses, nurse practitioners, masters-level social workers or psychologists, and doctoral level psychologists. These professionals are effective in providing brief psychotherapy, too, if that is offered by the clinic.

Paraprofessionals can be trained to serve in the clinical care manager role when their responsibilities are limited to monitoring treatment adherence and response and providing education to patients. Paraprofessionals are bachelor-level staff with some clinical experience, such as a licensed practical nurse.

Treatment monitoring
When face-to-face contacts are impractical or impossible, clinical care managers can work with patients through other means, including the telephone and televideo links. Consultation with the psychiatrist can also be done through these means.

Patient registry
The patient registry used to track those with identified mental health needs can be accomplished in several ways. It can be incorporated into the existing clinical database, as long as the necessary data are included and care managers are able to retrieve the information they need.

The registry can also be kept separate from the database in a simple Excel or Access spreadsheet. Collaborative care researchers have free patient registry templates available in Excel and Access. View a sample registry template.

The registry can also be created in a secure web-based application. Although expensive, this option can be especially useful to organizations in which the care manager, primary care physician, and psychiatrist are geographically separated. With a web-based registry, each member of the team can log on to the web site from any computer with Internet access to enter information or view the patients’ progress, facilitating communication.

Specialty mental health providers
Weekly supervision of the clinical care manager by a psychiatrist is critical when the patient intervention involves psychotropic medication. In some collaborative care models, psychiatrists are also available to the primary care physician for direct consultation on difficult patients.

The collaborative care model can also be set up such that mental health providers in the primary care setting work directly with collaborative care patients. Psychiatrists may provide medication management. Psychologists, social workers, and other qualified staff may provide counseling or brief evidence-based psychotherapy. When the patient intervention involves brief evidence-based psychotherapy, supervision by an experienced clinician (e.g., Ph.D. psychologist) can also be useful.

BACK TO TOP

How do patients move through a collaborative care system from detection to recovery?
Patients who screen positive for a psychiatric disorder during a visit with their primary care physician, or who primary care staff suspect may have a mental health problem, complete the mental health assessment tool. If the score on the mental health assessment tool indicates the presence of a psychiatric disorder, the primary care physician asks other pertinent questions to confirm the diagnosis. After confirming the diagnosis, the physician explains the diagnosis and treatment options to the patient and together they decide on an initial treatment plan. If the patient’s psychiatric disorder is too severe to manage in the primary care setting, the physician refers the patient to a specialty mental health provider.

The primary care physician or other staff provides the clinical care manager with the names of those who accept treatment. The clinical care manager gets in touch with the patient within one week of the initial diagnosis. In the first care management contact, the clinical care manager provides the patient with information about his or her psychiatric diagnosis and treatment, with the goal of empowering the patient and destigmatizing his or her disorder. The clinical care manager also assesses the patient’s initial treatment adherence and response and works with the patient to address any problems that have arisen.

After the first contact, the clinical care manager follows up with the patient monthly or more frequently as needed. If the clinical care manager has face-to-face contacts with the patient, they are usually arranged to coincide with the patient’s appointments with the primary care physician. During each contact with the patient, the clinical care manager assesses the patient’s treatment adherence and administers the mental health assessment tool to track symptom severity. If the patient is not participating in treatment, the clinical care manager works with the patient to identify and address the barriers to treatment adherence.

The clinical care manager logs all patient contacts, all attempts to contact the patient, treatment changes, and assessment tool scores into the patient registry. Information from contacts with the patients is routinely conveyed to the primary care physician.

If the patient is not responding to treatment, the clinical care manager conveys that information to the consulting psychiatrist during their weekly supervision. In preparation for the weekly supervision meeting, the clinical care manager uses the patient registry to identify patients who are not responding to treatment. The clinical care manager reviews these patients with the supervising psychiatrist. Any treatment recommendations, advice, or information that the psychiatrist provides is conveyed to the primary care physician by the clinical care manager.

The clinical care management contacts continue until the primary care physician determines that the patient is in recovery. As treatment winds down, the clinical care manager focuses on relapse prevention with the patient.

 

BACK TO TOP

What is the evidence for collaborative care?
Over 20 years of well-designed studies by several groups of researchers support the effectiveness of a collaborative care approach. The model has been used with patients diverse in ethnicity, age, gender, socioeconomic status, geographic location, and insurance status. View recent research that includes references to some of these studies.

Research shows that collaborative care is effective in decreasing primary care patients’ mental health symptoms and improving their psychosocial functioning and quality of life. Patients report that they like the model. Physicians and other primary care staff also respond positively to it, which helps decrease staff turnover rates.

Several variables have a significant impact on the effectiveness of the collaborative care model. Patient outcomes are better when the model includes:

Clinical care management conducted face to face, instead of by phone or televideo link
Clinical care managers who are professionals (e.g., nurses or psychologists), instead of paraprofessionals
The addition of a brief evidence-based psychotherapy, instead of medication and treatment monitoring alone.

It must be noted, however, that even a basic collaborative care package involving just medication and telephonic treatment monitoring provided by a paraprofessional is significantly more effective than usual care in treating mental health problems in the primary care setting.

The evidence for the model is so strong that researchers are moving away from simply examining its effectiveness to focus on its implementation in real-world settings. In the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Incentives program, for example, partnerships of service providers and payors have been funded to examine the financial barriers to integrated health care and to test out solutions to them. Results of the Incentives program are not yet available, but will be sometime during the course of this initiative. Projects like the Incentives program will shed light on the barriers to implementing collaborative care, but more work is needed.

Learn more about the RWJF Incentives program and other collaborative care studies.

BACK TO TOP

What are the barriers to integrated health care?
There are barriers to integrated health care at all levels of the service delivery system, from the patient up to health plans and purchasers. Some of the major barriers to integrated health care are outlined below.

Clinical barriers

Traditional separation of mental health issues from general medical issues
Lack of awareness of mental health screening tools in the primary care setting
Physicians' limited training in psychiatric disorders and their treatment
Limited options for referrals to specialty mental health providers, especially in rural settings
Lack of time to treat psychiatric disorders in the primary care setting
Physicians' limited access to consultation with specialty mental health providers, including psychiatrists
Patients' variable treatment adherence
Poor understanding of the factors that influence treatment adherence
Physicians' lack of interest in treating psychiatric disorders
Physicians' and patients' stigmatizing attitudes toward mental illness
Varying awareness of evidence-based treatments for both primary care and specialty mental health providers
Lack of training in evidence-based treatments for both primary care and specialty mental health providers

Financial barriers

Lack of insurance parity for psychiatric disorders
Medicaid's low payment rates
Restrictions on professional qualifications required for billing
Financial disincentives for physicians to treat psychiatric disorders
Managed care carve-outs' incentivization of certain practices (e.g., prescribing medications, referring to specialty mental health providers) over others (e.g., watchful waiting, brief counseling) in the primary care settings
Inability to bill essential, evidence-based activities (e.g., for consultation between psychiatrist and physician)
Physicians' varying ability to bill for providing evidence-based treatments
The cost of providing evidence-based treatments, including staffing, training, and patient tracking
Payers' incentivization of psychiatric treatments that are not evidence-based

Policy barriers

Separation of physical health and mental health funding streams
Difficulties in sharing information across organizations due to HIPAA and other policies
Restrictions on allowable activities for community health centers and community mental health centers
Limitations on the population eligible for public mental health services
Statutory or regulatory restrictions of public organizations

Organizational barriers

Shortage of mental health professionals, especially in rural settings
Physical separation of medical and mental health provider practices
Limited communication between medical and mental health professionals
Difficulties in sharing information across organizations
Differences in agency culture between medical and mental health settings
Territorialism
Lack of agreement between medical and mental health providers over who is responsible for care
Stigmatizing attitudes toward mental illness

BACK TO TOP

What are the Foundation’s goals for the Integrated Health Care Initiative?
We know that collaborative care is an effective model for integrating mental and physical health care services. However, real-world barriers to implementing the model stand in the way of its adoption by community providers.

The purpose of the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health’s Integrated Health Care Initiative is to address the barriers that inhibit the implementation of collaborative care approaches in the state of Texas.

To fulfill this goal, the Foundation is partnering with grantees to address the clinical, financial, policy, and organizational barriers they encounter as they implement a collaborative care model for managing psychiatric disorders in the primary care setting. Learn more about the Foundation's Integrated Health Care Initiative grant program.

BACK TO TOP


Grant Program Links & ResourcesPatient Registry Patient Education Recent Research Glossary


© 2007 Hogg Foundation for Mental Health
The University of Texas at Austin
The University of Texas at Austin Program Areas Contact Us Integrated Health Care IHC Grant Program IHC Links Priority Issues IHC Patient Registry IHC Recent Research IHC Patient Education IHC Glossary Hogg Foundation Home Page