|
Home

|
|
Integrated Health Care
In 2005, the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health completed a strategic
planning process through which it was decided to focus our grantmaking
in priority areas for the next several years. One priority area
is Integrated Health Care.
Funds in the
Integrated Health Care Initiative grant program were distributed
through a Request for Proposals (RFP) process in April 2006. Through
the RFP, the Foundation awarded more than $2.6 million over three
years to Texas primary care and pediatric clinics to promote effective
identification and treatment of mental health problems in primary
care settings.
The five grantee
organizations were funded to adopt the collaborative care model,
an integrated health care approach in which primary care and mental
health providers partner to manage the treatment of mental health
problems in the primary care or pediatric setting, and to address
barriers to implementation that they encounter. Two decades of research
have demonstrated that the collaborative care model improves primary
care patients' mental health outcomes with a minimal investment
of resources.
With the help
of national integrated health care experts and a distinguished evaluation
team, the Foundation is working with the Integrated Health Care
grantees over the three-year funding period to determine how best
to implement collaborative care in "real world" settings.
Lessons learned from the initiative will be used to promote integrated
health care across Texas.
This page provides
an overview of integrated health care and the collaborative care
model. Please use the links on the right side of the page to access
more information about the Integrated Health Care Initiative grant
program, as well as valuable clinical and research resources.
Why is the Foundation focusing on integrated health
care?
What is integrated health care?
What is collaborative care?
How can the collaborative care model be adapted to
fit an organization's unique needs?
How do patients move through a collaborative care
system from detection to recovery?
What is the evidence for collaborative care?
What are the barriers to integrated health care?
What are the Foundation's goals for the Integrated
Health Care Initiative?
Why
is the Foundation focusing on integrated health care?
State
and National Activities
Integrated health care is a timely focus for the Foundations
investment given activities at both the state and national level.
At the state level, the 2003 reorganization of Texas health
and human service agencies in the 78th legislative session reflected
the states awareness of the need for integrating mental and
physical health. In the reorganization, the state mental health
agency was brought under the larger umbrella of health in Texas
for the first time. Dr. David Lakey, Commissioner of the Texas
Department of State Health Services, has expressed his commitment
to integrated health care, as have many state health and mental
health leaders.
At the national level, the need to integrate physical and mental
health care was prominently highlighted in the final report of the
Presidents New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. One of
its subcommittees focused exclusively on the interface of general
medicine and mental health. The reason for this emphasis was summarized
in the subcommittees report to the President:
"A
fundamental premise of this report is that mental and medical
conditions are highly interconnected. Therefore, improving care
for individuals with mental disorders requires close attention
to the interface of mental health and general medical care."
The
integrated health care subcommittee concluded that there are well-tested,
effective models for providing integrated care. However, substantial
barriers exist to their implementation. The groundwork has been
laid, and the time is ripe for addressing those real-world barriers.
The
Foundations Core Values
Integrated health care comprises the core values to which the Foundation
has been committed since its inception in the 1940s, including:
Mental health services for the underserved, including rural
populations
Culturally competent
mental health service delivery
The elimination of
the stigma of mental illness
Most
people seek help for mental health problems in primary care settings,
such as community health clinics. Some do so because they are uninsured
or their insurance does not provide adequate coverage of mental
health services. For people in rural settings, the closest specialty
mental health clinic can be miles away. Cultural beliefs and attitudes
toward mental illness leads some people, especially those in ethnic
minority groups, to seek help in medical settings. With the recent
changes in the states eligibility criteria for public mental
health services, people whose psychiatric diagnoses are no longer
covered must now seek care in other settings, including primary
care clinics.
Providing
appropriate mental health treatment in the primary care setting
presents an important opportunity to reach groups who cannot or
will not access care in the specialty mental health setting. Treating
mental health problems in the primary care setting is also crucial
because many who seek help there have milder symptoms that, if treated
appropriately, can be prevented from developing into a more disabling
disorder.
Unfortunately, mental health problems often go undetected and untreated
in the primary care setting. Primary care physicians tend to miss
mental disorders in their patients about half the time. When physicians
do detect mental disorders in their patients, they often fail to
provide them with adequate treatment. Screening alone does not improve
outcomes for primary care patients with mental health problems,
nor does physician training. Patient outcomes do improve, however,
when screening and physician training are done in the context of
an integrated health care model, in which primary care patients
are provided effective treatment.
Now is the time to advance the integration of mental health and
physical health care. Solid research has demonstrated the effectiveness
of integration models. Federal and state leaders are encouraging
integration. Effective integration of mental and physical health
treatment will enable Texas to provide appropriate care to its most
ethnically diverse and geographically dispersed citizens and to
address mental health problems before
they worsen, saving money that would go to more extensive and expensive
care.
BACK
TO TOP
What
is integrated health care?
Integrated health care can
be defined in many ways. For the purposes of the Foundations
initiative, it means systematically combining physical and mental
health services. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways, and
integrated health care approaches vary in the extent to which they
are truly integrated.
The most common models of integrated health care focus on either referrals
or collocation of services.
With the referral approach, physical health care providers develop
agreements with mental health providers, to whom they refer their
patients with mental health needs. The physical health care providers
typically do not follow up on the referral once it has been made.
In a collocation model, physical health care providers and mental
health providers are physically located in the same building or on
the same premises, with the idea that the proximity of these services
will make it easier for people to access care for their physical and
mental health problems.
While both referrals and collocated services are important elements
of an integrated health care model, neither referrals alone or collocation
alone produces lasting, positive patient outcomes.
Over 20 years of solid research supports collaborative
care as the most effective model of integrated health care.
BACK
TO TOP
What
is collaborative care?
Collaborative
care is an integrated health care model in which physical health and
mental health providers partner to manage
the treatment of mild to moderate psychiatric disorders and stable
severe psychiatric disordersin the primary care setting.
Collaborative care can be effectively implemented in a number
of ways. It may include brief psychotherapy, or simply medication
management and patient education. There are 4 essential elements that
must be present in some form:
Mental health assessment tool
Clinical care manager
Patient registry
Psychiatric consultation.
A
mental health assessment
tool is used to evaluate the presence of psychiatric disorders in
primary care patients who screen positive for, or are suspected
of having, a psychiatric disorder. It is also used to track the
recovery of those with identified mental health needs.
A clinical care manager
is a professional or paraprofessional
who is responsible for following patients with identified mental
health needs in the primary care setting and monitoring their response
to treatment. Clinical care managers are the linchpin of the collaborative
care model. The clinical care manager has regular contact with the
patient to track his or her treatment
adherence and response. The clinical care manager also provides
the patient with education about the psychiatric disorder and its
treatment to empower the patient and to address stigmatizing beliefs.
This educational role is expanded when the patient is a child to
include outreach to the family, family and parent education, and
family empowerment (e.g., educating parents about what questions
to ask of a pediatrician or psychotherapist).
The clinical care managers role is qualitatively different
from that of a case manager or care coordinator. Clinical care managers
focus on the patients mental health needs and treatment, not
on their social service needs and linkages. They are responsible
for actively monitoring the patients treatment adherence and
response, not just managing patients appointments.
The typical active caseload for a full-time clinical care manager providing basic care management is 90 to 120 patients (or three to five new patients per week). A full-time clinical care manager can typically provide support to six or seven full-time primary care physicians.
The clinical care manager uses a patient
registry to track the patients with identified mental health
needs. The patient registry contains patients scores on the
mental health assessment tool, as well as a record of each contact
that the primary care physician and care manager has or attempts
to have with the patient.
A psychiatrist provides
supervision of the clinical care manager. Together, they review
the patient registry, focusing on those in the care managers
caseload who are not responding or adhering to treatment. When needed,
the psychiatrist makes recommendation for treatment adjustments
(e.g., medication change), which the care manager communicates to
the primary care physician.
BACK
TO TOP
How
can the collaborative care model be adapted to fit an organizations
unique needs?
There is
a great deal of flexibility in the collaborative care model, even
in the implementation of its required elements. Organizations can
create and implement a collaborative care system that reflects their
organizational resources and their patients needs.
Diagnostic
groups
The bulk of research on collaborative care models has focused on the
treatment of depression. However, emerging research has found the
collaborative care approach to be useful with other diagnoses, and
collaborative care experts agree that it can be useful in treating
many types of mild to moderate psychiatric disorders or stable severe
psychiatric disorders in the primary care setting.
Patient
identification
Patients with mental health needs can be identified in different ways.
Some providers choose to use a standardized screening instrument to
systematically screen primary care patients for mental health problems.
Other providers rely on informal means to identify patients with suspected
mental health needs. Both approaches have their costs and benefits.
Screening protocols improve the detection of mental health problems,
but can be costly and time-consuming. Informal detection imposes less
of a burden on primary care staff, but can lead to low rates of detection
of mental health problems. The best approach depends on the resources
of the organization.
Assessment
tools
Any instrument that covers the psychiatric diagnoses to be treated
in the primary care setting is appropriate, as long as it has adequate
psychometric properties (i.e., adequate reliability and validity with
the target population). Patients complete the assessment tool regularly,
so the clinical care manager can monitor their response to treatment.
The assessment tool is different
from a screening instrument.
A positive result on a screening instrument signals the physician
that the patient is likely experiencing difficulties. An assessment
tool is then used to establish that the patient is indeed experiencing
difficulties and the nature of the problem. The physician supplements
the assessment tool results with additional questions to confirm the
diagnosis.
Interventions
Psychotropic medication is the most common intervention used to treatment
mental health problems in the primary care setting. The primary care
physician or other qualified staff (e.g., nurse practitioner) prescribes
an antidepressant or other appropriate medication, and the care manager
monitors the patients response and adherence to the medication.
When pharmacotherapy is the intervention employed, the organization
may require its providers to use a medication
algorithm to guide the choice and dosage of medications. There
are multiple algorithms available for organizations interested in
adopting one.
Collaborative care models can also include brief evidence-based
psychotherapy as an intervention. There are several brief evidence-based
psychotherapies that have been used in the primary care setting, including
cognitive-behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, and problem solving
therapy. Behavior management and related evidence-based treatments
are also options for treating children. These therapies can be conducted
by clinical care managers with the appropriate credentials or by a
collocated mental health
professional.
Psychotherapy and behavior management approaches are particularly
important options for children. Depending on the diagnosis, pharmacotherapy
may not be the first-line remedy for children, given concerns about
the safety and effectiveness of using psychotropic medications with
children.
Clinical
care manager
A variety of professionals and paraprofessionals
can be trained to be effective caremanagers. Many of the research
studies on collaborative carehave used licensed professionals in that
role, including nurses, nurse practitioners, masters-level social
workers or psychologists, and doctoral level psychologists. These
professionals are effective in providing brief psychotherapy, too,
if that is offered by the clinic.
Paraprofessionals can be trained to serve in the clinical care manager
role when their responsibilities are limited to monitoring treatment
adherence and response and providing education to patients. Paraprofessionals
are bachelor-level staff with some clinical experience, such as a
licensed practical nurse.
Treatment
monitoring
When face-to-face contacts are impractical or impossible,
clinical care managers can work with patients through other means,
including the telephone and televideo links. Consultation with the psychiatrist can also be
done through these means.
Patient
registry
The patient
registry used to track those with identified mental health needs
can be accomplished in several ways. It can be incorporated into the
existing clinical database, as long as the necessary data are included
and care managers are able to retrieve the information they need.
The registry can also be kept separate from the database in a simple
Excel or Access spreadsheet. Collaborative care researchers have free
patient registry templates available in Excel and Access. View
a sample registry template.
The registry can also be created in a secure web-based application.
Although expensive, this option can be especially useful to organizations
in which the care manager, primary care physician, and psychiatrist
are geographically separated. With a web-based registry, each member
of the team can log on to the web site from any computer with Internet
access to enter information or view the patients progress, facilitating
communication.
Specialty
mental health providers
Weekly supervision of the clinical care manager by a psychiatrist
is critical when the patient intervention involves psychotropic medication.
In some collaborative care models, psychiatrists are also available
to the primary care physician for direct consultation on difficult
patients.
The collaborative care model can also be set up such that mental health
providers in the primary care setting work directly with collaborative
care patients. Psychiatrists may provide medication management. Psychologists,
social workers, and other qualified staff may provide counseling or
brief evidence-based psychotherapy. When the patient intervention
involves brief evidence-based psychotherapy, supervision by an experienced
clinician (e.g., Ph.D. psychologist) can also be useful.
BACK
TO TOP
How
do patients move through a collaborative care system from detection
to recovery?
Patients
who screen positive for a psychiatric disorder during a visit with
their primary care physician,
or who primary care staff suspect may have a mental health problem,
complete the mental health assessment
tool. If the score on the mental health assessment tool indicates
the presence of a psychiatric disorder, the primary care physician
asks other pertinent questions to confirm the diagnosis. After confirming
the diagnosis, the physician explains the diagnosis and treatment
options to the patient and together they decide on an initial treatment
plan. If the patients psychiatric disorder is too severe to
manage in the primary care setting, the physician refers the patient
to a specialty mental health provider.
The primary care physician or other staff provides the clinical
care manager with the names of those who accept treatment. The
clinical care manager gets in touch with the patient within one week
of the initial diagnosis. In the first care management contact, the
clinical care manager provides the patient with information about
his or her psychiatric diagnosis and treatment, with the goal of empowering
the patient and destigmatizing his or her disorder. The clinical care
manager also assesses the patients initial treatment
adherence and response and works with the patient to address any
problems that have arisen.
After the first contact, the clinical care manager follows up with
the patient monthly or more frequently as needed. If the clinical
care manager has face-to-face contacts with the patient, they are
usually arranged to coincide with the patients appointments
with the primary care physician. During each contact with the patient,
the clinical care manager assesses the patients treatment adherence
and administers the mental health assessment tool to track symptom
severity. If the patient is not participating in treatment, the clinical
care manager works with the patient to identify and address the barriers
to treatment adherence.
The clinical care manager logs all patient contacts, all
attempts to contact the patient, treatment changes, and assessment
tool scores into the patient
registry. Information from contacts with the patients is routinely
conveyed to the primary care physician.
If the patient is not responding to treatment, the clinical care manager
conveys that information to the consulting psychiatrist
during their weekly supervision. In preparation for the weekly supervision
meeting, the clinical care manager uses the patient registry to identify
patients who are not responding to treatment. The clinical care manager
reviews these patients with the supervising psychiatrist. Any treatment
recommendations, advice, or information that the psychiatrist provides
is conveyed to the primary care physician by the clinical care manager.
The clinical care management contacts continue until the primary care
physician determines that the patient is in recovery. As treatment
winds down, the clinical care manager focuses on relapse
prevention with the patient.
BACK
TO TOP
What
is the evidence for collaborative care?
Over
20 years of well-designed studies by several groups of researchers
support the effectiveness of a collaborative care approach. The
model has been used with patients diverse in ethnicity, age, gender,
socioeconomic status, geographic location, and insurance status.
View recent research that
includes references to some of these studies.
Research shows that collaborative care is effective in decreasing
primary care patients mental health symptoms and improving
their psychosocial functioning and quality of life. Patients report
that they like the model. Physicians and other primary care staff
also respond positively to it, which helps decrease staff turnover
rates.
Several variables have a significant impact on the effectiveness
of the collaborative care model. Patient outcomes are better when
the model includes:
Clinical care
management conducted face to face, instead of by phone or televideo
link
Clinical care managers
who are professionals (e.g., nurses or psychologists), instead
of paraprofessionals
The addition of a brief
evidence-based psychotherapy,
instead of medication and treatment monitoring alone.
It
must be noted, however, that even a basic collaborative care package
involving just medication and telephonic treatment monitoring provided
by a paraprofessional is significantly more effective than usual
care in treating mental health problems in the primary care setting.
The evidence for the model is so strong that researchers are moving
away from simply examining its effectiveness to focus on its implementation
in real-world settings. In the Robert Wood Johnson Foundations
Incentives program, for example, partnerships of service providers
and payors have been funded to examine
the financial barriers to integrated health care and to test out
solutions to them. Results of the Incentives program are not yet
available, but will be sometime during the course of this initiative.
Projects like the Incentives program will shed light on the barriers
to implementing collaborative care, but more work is needed.
Learn more about the RWJF Incentives
program and other collaborative care studies.
BACK
TO TOP
What
are the barriers to integrated health care?
There
are barriers to integrated health care at all levels of the service
delivery system, from the patient up to health plans and purchasers.
Some of the major barriers to integrated health care are outlined
below.
Clinical
barriers
Traditional separation of mental health issues from general medical
issues
Lack of awareness of mental health screening tools in the primary
care setting
Physicians' limited training in psychiatric disorders and their
treatment
Limited options for referrals to specialty mental health providers,
especially in rural settings
Lack of time to treat psychiatric disorders in the primary care
setting
Physicians' limited access to consultation with specialty mental
health providers, including psychiatrists
Patients' variable treatment adherence
Poor understanding of the factors that influence treatment adherence
Physicians' lack of interest in treating psychiatric disorders
Physicians' and patients' stigmatizing attitudes toward mental
illness
Varying awareness of evidence-based treatments for both primary
care and specialty mental health providers
Lack of training in evidence-based treatments for both primary
care and specialty mental health providers
Financial
barriers
Lack of insurance parity for psychiatric disorders
Medicaid's low payment rates
Restrictions on professional qualifications required for billing
Financial disincentives for physicians to treat psychiatric disorders
Managed care carve-outs' incentivization of certain practices
(e.g., prescribing medications, referring to specialty mental
health providers) over others (e.g., watchful waiting, brief counseling)
in the primary care settings
Inability to bill essential, evidence-based activities (e.g.,
for consultation between psychiatrist and physician)
Physicians' varying ability to bill for providing evidence-based
treatments
The cost of providing evidence-based treatments, including staffing,
training, and patient tracking
Payers' incentivization of psychiatric treatments that are not
evidence-based
Policy
barriers
Separation of physical health and mental health funding streams
Difficulties in sharing information across organizations due to
HIPAA and other policies
Restrictions on allowable activities for community health centers
and community mental health centers
Limitations on the population eligible for public mental health
services
Statutory or regulatory restrictions of public organizations
Organizational
barriers
Shortage of mental health professionals, especially in rural settings
Physical separation of medical and mental health provider practices
Limited communication between medical and mental health professionals
Difficulties in sharing information across organizations
Differences in agency culture between medical and mental health
settings
Territorialism
Lack of agreement between medical and mental health providers
over who is responsible for care
Stigmatizing attitudes toward mental illness
BACK
TO TOP
What
are the Foundations goals for the Integrated Health Care Initiative?
We
know that collaborative care is an effective model for integrating
mental and physical health care services. However, real-world barriers
to implementing the model stand in the way of its adoption by community
providers.
The purpose of the Hogg Foundation for Mental Healths Integrated
Health Care Initiative is to address the barriers that inhibit the
implementation of collaborative care approaches in the state of Texas.
To fulfill this goal, the Foundation is partnering with grantees to
address the clinical, financial, policy, and organizational barriers
they encounter as they implement a collaborative care model for managing
psychiatric disorders in the primary care setting. Learn more about
the Foundation's Integrated Health
Care Initiative grant program.
BACK
TO TOP
Grant
Program
Links & Resources
Patient Registry
Patient
Education Recent
Research Glossary
|
|